Comments on: EW.com reviews Adam Lambert’s album ‘For Your Entertainment’: B+

By: joely

joely — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:07:01 +0000

Wedding singer? Actually, trained vocalists often sound more alike than not – excellent technique tends to be somewhat universal, if that makes sense. It’s with the ubiquitous untrained, tone-deaf song “stylists” that you often get that “I can name that nasal singer in one note” effect. Just sayin’.

By: Laura

Laura — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:17:59 +0000

Reviews aren’t supposed to be about who wrote the songs. It’s his first album and he’ll come into his own soon enough, I can go with different opinions and not everyone’s gonna like him but that’s a really silly review. Go back and do it again properly! For what it’s worth I think the albums one of the best I’ve heard in ages.

By: Anne

Anne — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:25:23 +0000

While I agree that the review could have been better worded, Entertainment Weekly is actually a harsh master/mistress. They hand out B- all the time. So, a B+ is actually really good on their grading scale. Several new releases did not fair as well as Adam’s. Of course, his is the best of the bunch, so the higher grade goes without saying. : ) Anyhow, Entertainment Weekly is like the hard teacher in school, and Adam passed their test.

By: Terry

Terry — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:21:36 +0000

We want Michael back, he GETS it.

By: Elizabeth

Elizabeth — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:24:34 +0000

Odd. One of the first reviews I have ever seen that highlights the writers of the songs first instead of the artist. Not necessary, the list of the song-writers for this album has been on the internet for weeks, thanks anyway. I guess your point is that because Adam did not write all the songs, only co-wrote on 4 of them, that it diminishes his artistic integrity. World’s sauciest wedding singer? Not too often we see a derogatory about Adam’s voice! Could not disagree more. Adam”s vocals are flawless, mesmerizing and gorgeous.